Re: [ggf-ogsa-sec-wg] Re: Working towards the WG deliverables: archtitecture and roadmap

[Von Welch <welch@mcs.anl.gov>]

I agree with Akos here in that I believe we are at a point in time
where we need to start working bottom-up, folks are implementing (or
at least posed to) and need standards to develop to. Certainly if we
have folks interested in doing this work, we should be encouraging
that activity.

I don't think precludes ogsa-sec-wg from continuing the higher level
architecture.

Von

FROHNER Akos writes (17:00 March 19, 2004):
 > Raj,
 > 
 > On Fri, 2004-03-19 10:41:00 -0500, Nataraj Nagaratnam wrote:
 > [...]
 > > In short, I agree with your valuable comment and the need for moving 
 > > forward by defining interfaces. At this time in this WG, we are trying to 
 > > narrow the focus (thats what the charter did too) of these documents to 
 > > identify the services and then let other WGs help drill down into 
 > > interface definition.  Sounds reasonable?
 > 
 > Hmmm ... reading the OGSA-Sec documents I thought you have already
 > identified the most important services. So is it then the time to
 > split up the main activity of this group into service specific 
 > working groups?
 > 
 > Cheers,
 >     Akos
 >