RE: updated document

["Andrea Westerinen" <andreaw@cisco.com>]

I think that this is indicated in the schema.  Each of the classes
carries a Version qualifier.
Andrea

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nm-wg@gridforum.org [mailto:owner-nm-wg@gridforum.org] On
Behalf Of Dan Gunter
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 7:42 AM
To: nm-wg@ggf.org
Subject: Re: updated document


I have nitpicky versioning question for the group, and of course for 
poor beleaguered Andrea.

Let's assume that this profile has a version number (how is that 
assigned? 1.0?). Then I think it's reasonable to expect that the example

delay.roundTrip that Brian shows in the document, when it actually is 
sent "on the wire", will carry this version number with it -- how this 
happens is up to the implementation.

Where do we indicate this version number? In the profile itself? In the 
example delay.roundTrip measurement, as well? Somewhere else..?

- Dan

Brian Tierney wrote:
> 
> I made some updates to the document, based on the last phone call:
> 
> http://www-didc.lbl.gov/NMWG/NMWG-profile.html
> 
> Andrea: there are a couple CIM questions in there that hopefully you
> can answer (just search for "Andrea")
> 
> Also, a reminder that we have another call next week, usual time.
> 
> ------
> 
> Call: 510-665-5437
> 
> When: April 30, 2003, 08:00 AM America/Los_Angeles
> 
> Meeting ID: 5217
> 
> -----------
> 
>   
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> -------------------
>   Brian L. Tierney,   Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)
>   1 Cyclotron Rd.  MS: 50B-2239,  Berkeley, CA  94720
>   tel: 510-486-7381    fax: 510-495-2998   efax:  240-332-4065
>   bltierney@lbl.gov   http://www-didc.lbl.gov/~tierney
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

> ------------------