[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nm-wg] my notes from the call

Tanya Brethour wrote:

    - Dan said that he thought stabilization implied Doc/Lit (Mark said
      he also assumed that)
        o Eric (Boyd) and other implementors said that was OK


Sorry I missed the call. Is there a call next week or is it every 2 weeks?

Sorry, I meant "2 weeks from now".

Also, what exactly does the statement above mean? Are you talking about
schema stability? If so, why does that have anything to do with Doc/Lit. Doc/Lit is merely an implementation issue and to me that means that the
nm-wg should not really be concerned about.
Doc/Lit vs. RPC/Enc is an interoperability issue, which NM-WG is concerned about. If we assume Doc/Lit, then defining an XML schema automatically provides for syntactically interoperable implementations. Otherwise, we need to define the mapping to RPC/Enc.


Please correct me if I am missing something that is in the schema that
requires the doc/lit approach. 

    - Mark proposed: Doc/Lit stabilization first, then X months in
      future, release of 'new' schemas


So does this mean that the schema will be stabilized? If so, do you have a
list of outstanding issues? (besides joining the request/response
schemas).
I believe that Mark will soon produce something to this effect, based on discussions before and during GGF12.

Thanks,
Tanya