[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nm-wg] delay/loss related RFC's

I don't think anyone in this group has ever suggested a contrary approach. Please look at the report schema and (earlier) NM-WG "profile" document for details.

In trying to map these RFC's to concrete (XML) messages certain issues still come up, though. That's where I think we are now.

-Dan

Jeff W. Boote wrote:
I mentioned some RFC's on the call:

   RFC2679 A One-way Delay Metric for IPPM

   RFC2680 A One-way Packet Loss Metric for IPPM

And also perhaps useful:

   RFC2330 Framework for IP Performance Metrics

I believe we should at least begin with the RFC's as a starting point.
If there are specific reasons to depart from the RFC's than we can
discuss doing that. But a lot of very smart people have reviewed these,
and it seems foolish to me for us to not at least start with this work.

jeff


--
  ((    Dan Gunter
   ))   Computer Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
C|   |  M/S 50B-2239, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720
 |___|  Phone:510/495-2504 Fax:510/486-6363