Re: [nm-wg] Re: [ghpn-wg] Draft on Grid network services

[Dan Gunter <dkgunter@lbl.gov>]

I agree that 3.3.3 / 3.3.4 is in the scope of NM-WG. IMHO, if GHPN wants 
to work on defining the contents of these bullets they should do so 
through participation in NM-WG -- the input would no doubt improve the 
output. These sections of the document could simply summarize the 
results of that work. To be concrete, the current outline reads "proxy 
to NM-WG", but I would change this to "use NM-WG" (since NM-WG 
schemas/interfaces are already intended as general-purpose glue between 
existing systems).

- Dan

Paul D Mealor wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> W.r.t. sections 3.3.3 and 3.3.4: how's this going to work with NMWG? As I 
> understand it, there's not going to be a shared meeting between NMWG and 
> GHPN until actually *at* GGF10.
> I suspect I've misunderstood something along the way.
>
>
> I don't particularly want to hijack anything, but I already have some
> words written down about a Network Monitoring Grid Service (sec 3.3.3)  
> based on requirements that have come up while we were working on NMWG
> requirements documents, E2EpiPES work, and so on.  I'm not at all sure
> what sort of thing should go in the Draft on Grid network services, but
> hopefully some of this may be useful:
> http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~pdm/ghpn/ogsa-network-services.doc
>
> Paul
>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, George Clapp wrote:
>
>
> > Attached is the current draft on Grid network services.  It's in MS Word 
> > format and is still in outline with names associated with sections.  Could 
> > those who have volunteered to contribute to sections review the outline and 
> > add text?  The cutoff date for GGF10 is in February, which is fast approaching.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > George Clapp
> > 732-758-4346
> > clapp@research.telcordia.com