Tony Fletcher wrote:
Dear Nathan, Thanks that is very helpful. As you say the workflow pictures do indeed help.
I thought they would. :-)
I am hoping that you or Derek or Paul will be able to indicate when you are likely to be tackling the architecture document and I will try to dial in for awhile then - Thanks to you all.
What say ye, Derek?
The architecture document that you point me to is the one from May (that isHmm. Yes, I see that feedback now, upon revisiting the archive. Well, we'll definitely have more diagrams in the new architecture document. Other suggested additions are also welcome. Let's talk about it tomorrow.
the one I found anyway - please let me know if there is a problem and I
should be looking at a later draft). I have already commented on this one.
The main comment was that it could use a picture or two and I suggested one.
I suggest that you add the corrected version of mine and also the workflow
diags to explain the use of the architecture at each step (i.e. one (or more
) static views and as many dynamic views as necessary.