-----Original Message-----
From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 7:22 AM
To: Cowles, Robert D.
Cc: Von Welch; CAOPS-WG
Subject: Re: [caops-wg] Name Constraints - attempt at framing issues
Cowles, Robert D. wrote:
I really have trouble believing that anyone would believe
that brett or even brett@isp.net if identified by a certificate
from CA1 would have any relationship to the same name appearing
in acertificate from CA2.
Dear Bob
I am one of those who think they should refer to the same entity.
David
(In the case of the "email-like" address
it depends on (1) the security of the email system ... for instance
mindspring doesn't have a secure IMAP or POP option so I've just
been sitting thru a conference where a few people's passwords are
broadcast on the wireless network in clear text every 10-15 minutes
... (2) the policy of the isp about reuse of ids ... if the user
with the email name brett leaves, can I have that id now?
Bob
--
*****************************************************************
David W. Chadwick, BSc PhD
Professor of Information Systems Security
The Computing Laboratory, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF
Tel: +44 1227 82 3221
Fax +44 1227 762 811
Mobile: +44 77 96 44 7184
Email: D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk
Home Page: http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dwc8/index.html
Research Web site: http://sec.cs.kent.ac.uk
Entrust key validation string: MLJ9-DU5T-HV8J
PGP Key ID is 0xBC238DE5
*****************************************************************