[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [caops-wg] Name Constraints - attempt at framing issues
- To: "David Chadwick" <d.w.chadwick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [caops-wg] Name Constraints - attempt at framing issues
- From: "Cowles, Robert D." <rdc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:24:54 -0700
- Cc: "CAOPS-WG" <caops-wg@xxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: grdfm-caops-wg-outgoing@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
- Delivered-to: grdfm-caops-wg@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
- Sender: owner-caops-wg@xxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcXQyhFvGakfHGEuR1qA4IH2nQDDBAAANJVQ
- Thread-topic: [caops-wg] Name Constraints - attempt at framing issues
No ... we already have a "sort of" structure for that
... it's called DNS.
>
> Bob
>
> dont you think it is a little optimistic to assume that a TTP that
> cannot be trusted to issue unique names to its clients, can
> be trusted to get a unique name for itself?
>
> regards
>
> David