[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [caops-wg] OCSP document status

To: Olle Mulmo <mulmo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [caops-wg] OCSP document status
From: Mike Helm <helm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:32:19 -0700
Cc: caops-wg@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: grdfm-caops-wg-outgoing@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
Delivered-to: grdfm-caops-wg@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:19:04 +0200." <c812e650855d41a27e6ddd2641e67ce4@pdc.kth.se>
Reply-to: helm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-caops-wg@xxxxxxx

Olle Mulmo writes:
> Is someone interested in taking on the lead to shepherd the progress on 
>   the OCSP document for the next couple of weeks? In particular, what is 
> currently left is a discussion on the use of proxy certificates.

I should do this, but I am hosed for the next 2-3 weeks, due to an
obligation in the ESnet program.

I think I can recap at least some of the arguments where we left them
in June.

However is there a document refresh?

Thanks, ==mwh

References:
- [caops-wg] OCSP document status
  - From: Olle Mulmo

Prev by Date: [caops-wg] OCSP document status
Previous by thread: [caops-wg] OCSP document status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread