[caops-wg] XKMS next steps

[Mike Helm <helm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thought this might be of interest & time-critical....

------- Forwarded Message

From www-xkms-request@frink.w3.org  Fri Jul  1 06:08:47 2005
Message-ID: <42C54087.6050405@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:09:27 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jose.kahan@w3.org
CC: www-xkms@w3.org
References: <20050630145604.GB32638@rakahanga.inrialpes.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20050630145604.GB32638@rakahanga.inrialpes.fr>
Subject: Re: Debriefing teleconf for tuesday 5 June?
X-Mailing-List: <www-xkms@w3.org> archive/latest/1734
X-Loop: www-xkms@w3.org
Sender: www-xkms-request@w3.org
List-Id: <www-xkms.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-xkms-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>


Here's one that I've been thinking about for a long
while, but which has never gotten sufficient interest
from anyone to warrant doing work:

   How about XKMS as a way to allow XML applications to
   more easily integrate with Kerberos?

I imagine there won't be enough interest to do this,
but do let me know if I'm wrong.

Regards,
Stephen.

Jose Kahan wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> Would you be available for a teleconference next Tuesday at
> the usual time ( Time: 8:30am-9:30am PST/ 11:30am-12:30pm 
> EST/16:30-17:30 UTC [1]) to talk
> abut the publication of the Recommendation and next steps?
> 
> As I said in a previous message, our charter is extended until
> end of September 2005 so that we can do the after-publication
> maintenance (erratas and so on). At that time, if the WG wants to
> do further work in something else, it must be rechartered and
> the WG need to be reformed. Of course, if this is the goal, we shouldn't
> wait until end of September to start that. Last time we talked about
> this, there didn't seem to be any further need for rechartering.
> 
> During this period, I think that it would be interesting to try
> to focus on three tasks (just a proposal) that be a product
> of the WG:
> 
> - errata
> 
> - W3C Note: WSDL description for XKMS
>   We already have one proposal[1]. I noticed there was another
>   one in the original XKMS 1.o submission[2].
> 
> - documenting actual deployment, real use cases, tutorials...
>   anything that can incite people to adopt this technology faster
> 
> Do you have other topics you would like to discuss? How about the ideas
> that were around for completing the PGP support in xml:dsig? We could
> document them and do some kind of early implementation to make this
> progress quickly and publis it as a note too. 
> 
> If people are not available for meeting next week, could I know who
> is interested in participating in the WSDL XKMS Note so that
> we can examine our resources and evaluate if we can get it ready
> by end of September?
> 
> Does this make sense? It's ok with me if you want to handle it through
> email rather than thru a teleconf.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -jose
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2005Mar/0027
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms/#_Toc505753190
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/



------- End of Forwarded Message