[caops-wg] OCSP - use of nonce

[Olle Mulmo <mulmo@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> There are a couple of remarks about nonces that I think the
> sophisticated security worker - especially some of the ones I was 
> hoping to interest in this service - would not agree to.  I have no 
> problem with the language in 4.5 but the client recommendation 
> somewhere in section 7 just says flat out don't do it -- seems 
> contradictory.  There are circumstances where real time is needed.  We 
> need a nuanced nonce instead.
The intended spirit of Section 7 was to say don't do it -- by default. 
Your suggested modifications below will be incorporated.

> In 7.3, say
> OCSP clients are not recommended to include nonces except  ... - or -
> OCSP clients should only include nonces  ... in requests to local 
> Trusted responders or other OCSP responders by prior agreement and 
> consultation.  (See section 4.5.)
>
> In 4.5 say
> Some services may not support nonce requests, and in other cases it 
> may produce intolerable burden on the OCSP responder and delay for the 
> client application.  Nonces should only be used in situations where 
> the most up to date information is required, particularly to meet 
> security requirements.
>
> [Drop the "overkill" sentence - not useful.]